Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Med Qual ; 33(4): 397-404, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29345150

RESUMO

Previous studies have identified drug and alcohol use as risk factors for readmission using claims data, but not by using substance use screening scores. This preliminary study tested the hypothesis that prevalence of 30-day readmission would be higher among patients screening positive on the 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-10) or the 10-item Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10) tools at intake than among the general patient population. Social workers screened 4708 adult inpatients using prescreening questions followed by the AUDIT-10 and/or DAST-10. Patients with positive screens were followed for readmissions within 30 days of discharge. A positive screening score on the AUDIT-10 or DAST-10 instrument at intake was associated with higher risk of readmission to the general medicine wards within 30 days; this relationship appears complex and subject to mediation. Post hoc chart review found that the majority of readmissions among patients with positive screens were not immediately attributable to substance use. Further study is needed to verify these preliminary findings.


Assuntos
Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Alcoolismo/diagnóstico , Feminino , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Alta do Paciente , Grupos Raciais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistentes Sociais , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol ; 2: 2333392815612476, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28462268

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is an efficacious prevention practice. However, little research has assessed differences in prescreening outcomes between inpatient and outpatient primary care or among different prescreening administration methods. This study tested whether administration method (self-administered vs interview) and setting (inpatient versus outpatient) predicted prescreening outcomes in a large sample of primary care patients. Then, among patients who prescreened positive, it tested whether full screening scores differed by administration method and setting. METHODS: Researchers used binomial logistic regression to assess predicted prescreening outcomes and analysis of variance to assess differences in SBIRT screening scores across a total of 14 447 unique patient visits in 10 outpatient sites and 1 centrally located hospital. RESULTS: Controlling for gender, depression, and other substance use, both medical setting and method of prescreening, predicted prescreening results. Among patients who prescreened positive for alcohol, setting also was associated with mean screening scores. However, outcomes were not uniform by substance (eg, alcohol vs other drugs). CONCLUSION: The results support previous studies on this topic that had utilized cross-study comparison or that were not specific to SBIRT prescreening/screening mechanisms. At the same time, nuanced findings were observed that had not previously been reported and suggest the need for further research in this area.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...